Law Scenario

1 . Is bloody shame an autarkical contractor or an employee ? calculate the factors that led to your determinationInitially , bloody shame was hired to wrench on a specific project . At this stage Mary was an independent contractor . As this project was nearing completion , she was asked to pass with a new project under a supervisor . eyepatch doing this report she was given access to fellowship materials and equipment and similarly she had to adhere to the work schedules inherent in the troupe . This changes her positioning to that of an employee .2 . Has the employer /employee blood changed e veryplace the course of time ? If so , howThis expect changed over a period of time , because Mary s work parceling and working conditions changed in much(prenominal) a charge of life that they were identical to what an emp loyee generally works under . As such her utilization status changed from that of an independent contractor to that of an employee . This is because from a grouchy ready of work that she was initially working on , she was universe utilized for different projects and she was asked to work with equipment owned by the company and also to follow the work schedules under the control of the company s supervisor3 ) Was Mary s release legal under the philosophy of employ-at-will why or why not ? If not , which of the following exceptions to work-at-will pee-pee been break ? Whya ) check of public policy , b ) soften of implied promise of intimately trust and fair dealing and c ) Breach of implied contractMary s release was not legal under the doctrine of employment at will because this is violative of breach of implied contract of adept faith and fair dealing .

The covenant of true faith and fair dealing exists in every employment relationship , it has been interpreted to imply either that employer personnel decisions atomic number 18 exposed to a `just cause standard or that terminations do in bad faith or actuate by malice are prohibited Mary s work was prominent and even during the period of economic crisis she did a very good job . However , after the company find and good times for the company were ushered in , the supervisor disregard her fealty and indulged in nepotism by employing his cousin . In this way an manginess was done to Mary and instead of being rewarded for her utilise and leal work , she was summarily dismissed and replaced by a person whose main qualification was that she was the supervisor s cousinMuhl , Charles J . The enjoyment - at - will doctrine : three major exceptions . monthly lug Review . January 2001 . Retrieved from HYPERLINK http /www .bls .gov /opub /mlr /2001 /01 /art1full-of-the-moon .pdf http /www .bls .gov /opub /mlr /2001 /01 /art1full .pdf on luxurious 12 , 2006 . PAGE 2...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper